Presidents some day?

RagenR&B · 03-04-2015, 09:22 PM

So this photographer stumbles upon a young couple... "Hey, can I take your photograph? I think you'll both be president some day." "Uh... sure.. man... whatever."

56Nomad · 03-04-2015, 09:42 PM

Fat chance Roger..... even the liberals are hammering her

The New Republic is a liberal American magazine of commentary on politics and the arts published since 1914, with major influence on American political and cultural thinking…..

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/1...pared-election

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/05/us...ards.html?_r=0

RagenR&B · 03-04-2015, 09:58 PM

Wasn't so much a plug for Hilary as an attempt at humor. I'm not a fan myself. I really don't think she can stand up to the impending scrutiny with so many skeletons. We will see.

I can say that the Dems feel like they're leaning on her a bit much for 2016... May not work out well.

QH · 03-04-2015, 10:14 PM

The times piece left out some pretty important dates on federal laws they talk about and are the central focus of their story. Those dates were all post Clinton SOS days. They will throw everything but the kitchen sink at her which will probably only help her win in 16... Never been a fan of her myself, love her husband though.

QH · 03-04-2015, 10:21 PM

http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...t-so-fast.html

RagenR&B · 03-04-2015, 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QH

http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...t-so-fast.html

This article supports (or asks) some of the same questions that I have. Call me me ignorant, but going after her because of the use of "private" email appears to be a bit of a witch-hunt (no pun intended). Is she really the first to do this? The Clintons usually do well under fire and this may back fire on the conservative lynch squad.

56Nomad · 03-05-2015, 01:45 AM

First of all.... I'm so happy that both Roger and Bob will not be voting for her

Now more good news:

Democrats Aren’t Rushing To Defend Hillary Clinton

http://www.nationaljournal.com/polit...inton-20150304

jws · 03-05-2015, 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 56Nomad

First of all.... I'm so happy that both Bob and mini Bob will not be voting for her

x2

sin cal hd · 03-05-2015, 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RagenR&B

This article supports (or asks) some of the same questions that I have. Call me me ignorant, but going after her because of the use of "private" email appears to be a bit of a witch-hunt (no pun intended). Is she really the first to do this? The Clintons usually do well under fire and this may back fire on the conservative lynch squad.

I dont see what the big deal is either. Mediate was reporting that Gen. Powell used a private account too. Im sure many high positions are using some sort of other messaging.

Someone was saying it has to do with info be available for the historical archives or some bs.

RagenR&B · 03-05-2015, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 56Nomad

First of all.... I'm so happy that both Roger and Bob will not be voting for her

Never said that.... There's plenty of opposition out there that would EASILY make her the lesser of evils!

03-04-2015, 09:22 PM	#1
RagenR&B Yabba Dabba Do Hooligan Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 594 Rep Power: 0	Presidents some day? So this photographer stumbles upon a young couple... "Hey, can I take your photograph? I think you'll both be president some day." "Uh... sure.. man... whatever."

03-04-2015, 09:42 PM	#2
56Nomad Hooligeezer King Hooligan Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: La Selva Beach Posts: 4,310 Rep Power: 0	Fat chance Roger..... even the liberals are hammering her The New Republic is a liberal American magazine of commentary on politics and the arts published since 1914, with major influence on American political and cultural thinking….. http://www.newrepublic.com/article/1...pared-election http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/05/us...ards.html?_r=0 __________________ 2013 Jeep Wangler Sport 2012 Itasca Motorhome (powered by 900 Watts of solar panels) Last edited by 56Nomad; 03-04-2015 at 09:46 PM.

03-04-2015, 09:58 PM	#3
RagenR&B Yabba Dabba Do Hooligan Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 594 Rep Power: 0	Wasn't so much a plug for Hilary as an attempt at humor. I'm not a fan myself. I really don't think she can stand up to the impending scrutiny with so many skeletons. We will see. I can say that the Dems feel like they're leaning on her a bit much for 2016... May not work out well. Last edited by RagenR&B; 03-04-2015 at 10:05 PM.

03-05-2015, 01:45 AM	#7
56Nomad Hooligeezer King Hooligan Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: La Selva Beach Posts: 4,310 Rep Power: 0	First of all.... I'm so happy that both Roger and Bob will not be voting for her Now more good news: Democrats Aren’t Rushing To Defend Hillary Clinton http://www.nationaljournal.com/polit...inton-20150304 __________________ 2013 Jeep Wangler Sport 2012 Itasca Motorhome (powered by 900 Watts of solar panels)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

03-04-2015, 10:14 PM	#4
QH Hooligan King Hooligan's Partner Hooligan Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 12,750 Rep Power: 99	The times piece left out some pretty important dates on federal laws they talk about and are the central focus of their story. Those dates were all post Clinton SOS days. They will throw everything but the kitchen sink at her which will probably only help her win in 16... Never been a fan of her myself, love her husband though.

03-04-2015, 10:21 PM	#5
QH Hooligan King Hooligan's Partner Hooligan Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 12,750 Rep Power: 99	http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...t-so-fast.html